Esquire Theme by Matthew Buchanan
Social icons by Tim van Damme

20

May

(Source: fckthestate)

11 minutes ago Short URL 8 notes

antidelusions via antidelusions

the-silently-loud: To all of you <3

the-silently-loud:

To all of you <3

11 minutes ago Short URL 195 notes

visualamor via visualamor

44 minutes ago Short URL 299 notes

star-wars-daily via star-wars-daily

antidelusions: Stop calling people bitches. Start a revolution!

antidelusions:

Stop calling people bitches. Start a revolution!

(Source: the-xutes)

45 minutes ago Short URL 11 notes

antidelusions via antidelusions

46 minutes ago Short URL 1 note

asabiniambi via asabiniambi

briliantlife: Facebook on We Heart It - http://weheartit.com/entry/61992462/via/nohoeslikeme Hearted from: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151491104325326&amp;set=a.10150508555120326.373665.210103935325&amp;type=1&amp;theater

briliantlife:

Facebook on We Heart It - http://weheartit.com/entry/61992462/via/nohoeslikeme

Hearted from: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151491104325326&set=a.10150508555120326.373665.210103935325&type=1&theater

46 minutes ago Short URL 28 notes

hippie-with-dreads via hippie-with-dreads

19

May

xxx ღ Click the heart for more post like this xo xxx dope skullie

xxx ღ Click the heart for more post like this xo xxx

dope skullie

(Source: fashionbadbitxches)

1 day ago Short URL 40 notes

champagne-diamondsz via champagne-diamondsz

18

May

(Source: deathologist)

1 day ago Short URL 289 notes

illmatic-halflife via illmatic-halflife

1 day ago Short URL 380 notes

illmatic-halflife via illmatic-halflife

(Source: paganfaeriegirl)

1 day ago Short URL 69 notes

blaqmercury via blaqmercury

1 day ago Short URL 88 notes

thinksquad via thinksquad

(Source: idkurperfect)

1 day ago Short URL 17,373 notes

dreadlocks-acid via dreadlocks-acid

priceofliberty: sometimes-i-smile: priceofliberty: theweightofemptiness: rhrealitycheck: makes sense. But it does. Contraceptives have not led people to prudent sexual activity. They are no longer bound to one another. Contraceptives intensify the desire for pleasure and so it becomes the only aim of sex. Surely no one believes contraceptives, because they are legal, are never refused or always work. Condoms break, a tempted couple doesn’t use them, a woman forgets to take a pill, and so on. Why must you imagine things work out precisely as optimists have planned. Because to believe contrariwise would shatter their worldview of pre-planned perfection. You’re an optimist if you think we’re all not having sex till we’re married. Just saying, that’s not happening. Not at all. Apparently it has not worked out precisely as you have planned. I don’t think it’s necessary to construct weightofemptiness’s argument as wholly anti-contraceptive; instead, he was focusing on one aspect of contraception’s impact on society, and that is notable promiscuity. Of course, a lot of people would argue this segment of the population has always existed. So it’s certainly true that not every “waits for marriage.” But even those who “wait for marriage” can still conceive 6 too many children because they, too, had improper notions regarding contraception which, I think, is the whole point here. It’s absolutism to say “yes, contraception leads to more babies born out of wedlock,” but only inasmuch as it is to say “no, contraception does not make sex more appealing” which is how this issue is usually addressed.

priceofliberty:

sometimes-i-smile:

priceofliberty:

theweightofemptiness:

rhrealitycheck:

makes sense.

But it does. Contraceptives have not led people to prudent sexual activity. They are no longer bound to one another. Contraceptives intensify the desire for pleasure and so it becomes the only aim of sex. Surely no one believes contraceptives, because they are legal, are never refused or always work. Condoms break, a tempted couple doesn’t use them, a woman forgets to take a pill, and so on. Why must you imagine things work out precisely as optimists have planned.

Because to believe contrariwise would shatter their worldview of pre-planned perfection.

You’re an optimist if you think we’re all not having sex till we’re married. Just saying, that’s not happening. Not at all. Apparently it has not worked out precisely as you have planned.

I don’t think it’s necessary to construct weightofemptiness’s argument as wholly anti-contraceptive; instead, he was focusing on one aspect of contraception’s impact on society, and that is notable promiscuity. Of course, a lot of people would argue this segment of the population has always existed. So it’s certainly true that not every “waits for marriage.” But even those who “wait for marriage” can still conceive 6 too many children because they, too, had improper notions regarding contraception which, I think, is the whole point here.

It’s absolutism to say “yes, contraception leads to more babies born out of wedlock,” but only inasmuch as it is to say “no, contraception does not make sex more appealing” which is how this issue is usually addressed.

(Source: leffetfeministe)

1 day ago Short URL 127 notes

priceofliberty via priceofliberty

Playing with smoke

Playing with smoke

2 days ago Short URL

Zion &amp; I acting silly

Zion & I acting silly

2 days ago Short URL